Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla finally admits to the vaccines offering little to no protection.

Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla finally admits to the vaccines offering little to no protection.

Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla finally admits to the vaccines offering little to no protection.

Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla finally admits to the vaccines offering little to no protection.

On the 10th January 2022, Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla appeared on Yahoo Finance news channel to discuss his latest thoughts on Vaccines and Omicron. If we listen carefully, this interview is hugely telling, yet did I see, read  or hear anything else from other MSM news outlets regarding this information? No. Of course not.

When asked a broad question regarding the upcoming Boosters, the Omicron scenario and what can be expected in the fall of 2022, in amongst Mr Albert Bourla’s reply is this piece of insight:

“We know that the two doses of a vaccine offer very limited protection – if any. The three doses with a booster, they offer reasonable protection against hospitalisation and deaths – against death very good – and less protection against infection”

So, the fact that he says the 2 doses of the Vaccine offer little to no protection is mind blowing in its self, especially as the Main Stream Media did not and has not reflected his answer in any of their portrayal of what they call news what so ever.

Then, what I believe is maybe more important is when he tells us that the 2 doses of the vaccine and the Booster offers less protection against infection. “LESS PROTECTION AGAINST INFECTION”!

This I suppose can be interpreted in two different ways. Less protection in comparison to what they once offered-which is true OR less protection as a whole, as in they lower your defences and make it so you are more inclined to get the Virus.

In the light of recent news that the mRNA Vaccines can be causing VAIDS (Vaccine acquired immunodeficiency syndrome) his answer would make complete sense with this knowledge.
How else can the vaccines offer you protection against death but make it so you are more susceptible to the virus?
This is also something that has been observed with previous vaccines.

An analogy that I have heard is imagine your immune system is like an arsenal of weapons. If a virus comes along -once your immune system has trained itself – you have just the right weapon to kill it, so your immune system has a broad range of weapons to protect you from the broad range of virus’ and other infections.

With these mRNA vaccines, the mRNA instructs your immune system to code for the spike proteins so then your body will make the anti-bodies for Covid-19. Now the problem seems to be that as the mRNA is housed in Nano-lipids, these nano-lipids are staying in the body for longer than what was anticipated, this is then causing your body to continue receiving the new mRNA instructions to build the Spike protein and will continue to keep doing so for as long as its told. This then creates a situation where you immune system is under direct orders to create the instructed Spike protein and nothing else, leaving your body and immune system open to attack from other areas as your immune system is otherwise pre-occupied. Using the weapons analogy, you will have the weapon to Kill covid-19, but if some other infection comes along then the question is will your immune system be able to protect you as it once normally would?

So that would then make sense as to why Albert Bourla can the vaccines still offer protection against hospitalisation and death, yet offer less protection against infection.
And remember, Vaccines are 100% SAFE!

 
Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Telegram
Reddit

Related Articles